One Faith Day One Continued...
II: The Apostolic Fathers
i: Intro
The Apostolic Fathers were the collection of men and writings that promoted the teaching of the apostles. They are called the Apostolic Fathers because it is known or assumed that they or their authors were mentored by the apostles and therefore had an authority unmatched by any of that time period. These people and documents were the guiding light of the early Church as there was no New Testament in its canonized (decided and universal) form to turn to. The men in this category were the first theologians (studiers of God) and leaders in the Church to take up the mantle of special leadership not being apostles. The writings in this group were the first Christian literature ever written outside the scriptures and make up the foundations of later theological (the studying of God) thought.
ii: Polycarp
Polycarp was one of the men who were Apostolic Fathers. He had the clearest connection to the apostles, having studied at the feet of John. It was to him that the early Church turned to settle disputes of the faith. Polycarp was the bishop of Smyrna and is known for his connection to another Apostolic Father, Ignatius, and his letter to the Philippians. His writings show the example of apostolic teaching in the Apostolic Fathers, his writings being saturated with what would become the New Testament. He lived immersed in these apostolic teachings. He would die the death of a martyr around the year 155 in his own city, a death recorded in The Martyrdom of Polycarp, an important work in the ‘cult of martyrs’ that would lead to the Sainthood system of the Roman Catholic Church.
iii: Clement
Clement was another of the men who were considered Apostolic Fathers. He was the bishop Rome and is believed by some to have personally known Paul the apostle. He is famous for his letters 1st Clement and 2nd Clement, the former possible being the oldest extant (existing) writing of the church aside from that which is in the New Testament. His writings parallel closely Paul’s 1st and 2nd Corinthians, showing the Corinthians to be dealing with many of the same problems half a century later.
iv: Ignatius
Ignatius was the bishop of Antioch around the turn of the first century. The bishopric in such an important city of Christianity indicates that he was a high-ranking leader of the Church. The particular time period in which he was a bishop of so important a city has led many to believe that he must have known some of the apostles. He is known for a group of letters he sent to Christians all over the Roman world while he was under guard on his way to his martyrdom in Rome. This collection of seven letters exhorted Christians to follow in the belief of the apostles and to be obedient to the bishops. One of these letters was written to encourage his fellow bishop Polycarp in Smyrna. Another letter was written to Rome in an attempt to put down a conspiracy to free him. Ignatius wrote to these Christian saying, “I implore you, do not be ‘unseasonably kind’ to me. Let me be food for the wild beasts, through whom I can reach God. I am God’s wheat, and I am being ground by the teeth of wild beast, that I might prove to be pure bread.” Ignatius also said that “Christianity is greatest when it is hated by the world.” These attitudes led him bravely to his death, one that he considered a gift, in a Roman amphitheatre at the hands of wild beast. His work also contained the first upholding of the full divinity and full manhood of Christ, giving proof that this was the doctrine of the apostles. His example of following his Lord to the death would inspire generations of Christians to do the same, even encouraging some to seek this death. This example is so pertinent to this day and age as Christians in modernized society sell their souls and the souls of others to enjoy the muted pleasures of modern society while in third world countries more and more Christians face their ends in gruesome martyrdoms. As so many across Europe and America wiled away their time last century as more Christians were killed for their faith than in any other century, the example of Ignatius would have been a good one to follow, serving God not with a risk of danger but a certainty of death and yet doing it willing and eagerly.
v: Shepherd of Hermas
The best known and longest of the writings that make up the Apostolic Fathers, the Shepherd of Hermas nearly made it into the canon of scripture. Throughout the centuries before the setting down of the canon this book was often include in lists of scripture and taken as scripture by many great leaders of Christianity, most notably Athanasius, the man who would centuries later set down the canon in his Easter Letter of 367, though he did leave it out of his final list which we still use to this day. The book was heavily moralistic and even assured that there was one chance for forgiveness after baptism for those who fall away but no more. The document lays out in length the practices of Christians in this era, and set down the standards for practice of worship. All of these teachings come in parable form from an angel who visited ‘Hermas’, a fictional character, as a shepherd and gave him the visions that make up the book. It is written like many first/second century apocalyptic literature, similar to John’s Revelation and gave a picture into the early Christian mindset that was continually looking for the return of Christ to happen at any second, a helpful attitude to hold to this day.
vi: Dadache
The Didache, or the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, was an early document circulated through the Church though no one knows who wrote it. The teachings in it are very moralistic, a common trait in the early Church. It teaches Christians the way to act in society and gives instruction on how to perform the sacraments (baptism and Holy Communion). Interestingly it gives a somewhat contradictory plan on testing but not testing prophets:
But concerning the apostles and prophets, act according to the decree of the Gospel. Let every apostle who comes to you be received as the Lord. But he shall not remain more than one day; or two days, if there's a need. But if he remains three days, he is a false prophet. And when the apostle goes away, let him take nothing but bread until he lodges. If he asks for money, he is a false prophet. And every prophet who speaks in the Spirit you shall neither try nor judge; for every sin shall be forgiven, but this sin shall not be forgiven. But not every one who speaks in the Spirit is a prophet; but only if he holds the ways of the Lord. Therefore from their ways shall the false prophet and the prophet be known. And every prophet who orders a meal in the Spirit does not eat it, unless he is indeed a false prophet. And every prophet who teaches the truth, but does not do what he teaches, is a false prophet. And every prophet, proved true, working unto the mystery of the Church in the world, yet not teaching others to do what he himself does, shall not be judged among you, for with God he has his judgment; for so did also the ancient prophets. But whoever says in the Spirit, Give me money, or something else, you shall not listen to him. But if he tells you to give for others' sake who are in need, let no one judge him.
Despite the moralistic teachings and somewhat contradictory teaching, the Didache remained in use for many years and was referred to by many great Christian leaders in their writings throughout the early centuries. Their references were all the evidence we had of the existence of the document until it was discovered in 1873. Again, its teachings were far more moralistic than scripture and they went against what Paul had written in his letters, but the Didache and other early writings show us how early Christians were digesting the teachings of the Apostles without a set New Testament. This moralistic teaching and obedient power structure was the Church of the early centuries, our forefathers and the ones who laid down one of the earliest layers in the foundations of this our God’s Church.
vii: Epistle of Barnabas
The Epistle of Barnabas was not written by Barnabas, being pseudopigraphal writing, but was considered an important document in the Church. It is assumed that the author had known the apostle Apollos and that the letter was written some where between 70 and
135. This writing shows the early influence of Greek philosophy on orthodox Christianity. The letter is heavily allegorical, taking passages in the Old Testament and giving them far different meanings, such as making Moses’ admonition not to eat pig to mean that one should not associate with those who act like ‘swine.’ This followed closely in the Jewish tradition of Philo, a Jewish philosopher from around the time of Christ who allegorized the whole of the Old Testament in his attempt demonstrate harmony between the scriptures and Greek philosophy. While the writer of the Epistle did not deny what was written in the Old Testament he did follow in the Christian tradition of that time to look for two or three meanings under the written text, a practice still used today in teaching scripture. The Epistle of Barnabas was the first to lay down a Hermeneutic (way of interpretation) structure in Christian literature for reading scripture.